Given it's sheer success at the box-office, different people have liked Raju Hirani's latest film on different accounts; the most obvious one being the immense entertainment quotient. I myself have been entertained every bit (including the baby delivery scene) on both occasions when I watched the movie. But after my second viewing, as an aspiring filmmaker I began to dissect the film. So let me confess that whatever is written below is just a different take that goes beyond the obvious entertainment that the film profusely provides.
The film preaches "Don't follow success; follow excellence"; but the film itself follows the success formula and ignores excellence. It shamelessly follows the Bollywood cliches (like the same education system which it complains against) and imparts bookish ideals at regular intervals to entertain those, who funnily and temporarily feel rejuvenated at realizing the ideal through the film. Like Rang de Bansathi, this film has the misleading-the-youth shade as well. Most people don't like studies, not because they are skilled at other things; but because they don't want to do anything. They just want to wander around without learning or doing anything. This film provides ample sunshine for such people to make hay.
Isn't it ironical that a lot of films that preach do not actually follow what they preach. A film that preaches peace, does it only after showcasing an entertainingly shot violent war scene. In most films, the hero winning over the wrong-doer happens only after a temptingly shot rape scene has entertained the front-bench-folks. More worse are those films that showcase sensuous bare-backed-ladies, while calling themselves conservatively traditional family dramas. What's even more crazy about these films is, they turn out to be the bigger block-busters at the ticket-window. With enough mediocrity that excites the Indian massses (including me), '3-Idiots' no doubt is an all-time block-buster.
But inspite of the film theading the success formula, there is one scene in the film which deserves to be called excellent. Rancho, having made some modifications, makes Joy Lobo's heli-camera work. He, along with Farhan and Raju, decide to surprise Joy Lobo with the working machine floating at his window. So, there is an intercut between them and the monitor which displays what the camera is capturing. The helicopter is made to fly across the hostel and everyone are excited to see the video on the monitor. Joy Lobo's room is on the 2nd floor. The helicopter is lifted to the first floor and we see a guy dancing in his breifs. Everyone, including the audience, laugh. The helicopter is lifted higher to Joy Lobo's window. The audience, like the characters in the film, are now tuned to the happy mood; just then, when the helicopter reaches Joy Lobo's window, we are cut back to the monitor to find Joy Lobo hanging from the ceiling of his room. The very next shot, we see the three heroes running as fast as they can to Joy Lobo's room. They see Joy Lobo's dead face above. But, we are only shown his hanging legs. And the focus shifts to the words on the wall: I quit. This scene, in terms of screenplay, editing, acting and background score, is the best scene to have been churned out in the recent Bollywood releases.
For me the excellent part of 3 Idiots is: Joy Lobo.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Friday, December 18, 2009
AVATAR: The Pride of Human Imagination
If there is anything that can capture human imagination to the best, it's -- cinema. If there is any cinema that clearly shows the ethereal beauty of human imagination, that's -- James Cameron's AVATAR. And if there is any line that can sum up the brilliance of this film...... then that bloody line is absolutely fake.
The story is about human greed that spreads beyond the limits of earth and tries to disrupt the placidity of a Heaven-like planet named Pandora. The story is also about human goodness that restores the flora and fauna of the deservingly beautiful world. Lastly, the story is specifically about a nice guy who feels crippled among the corrupted mankind and yearns to live among the pristine alien race.
James Cameron and Co deserve Heaven for making this movie. I don't know who can give them that. But, all I can do is..... add a few more dollars to their gross revenue, by watching this movie a few more times. Is anyone ready to join me in this divinely devilish delight?
Thursday, December 17, 2009
MNIK teaser -- Pangs of Fanaticism
Sincerely, I felt it hard to appreciate the first teaser of the upcoming SRK film -- My Name is Khan. Probably because it isn't anything beyond what the director Karan Johar has been flaunting about for the past three years. There isn't anything that would excite me about the film, as the theme has been handled very recently in our own very Bollywood through films like New York and Kurbaan. Also, the film tends not to stick to the 911 incident; instead it wants to handle every major calamity that happened in the US and link it to the minority bashing. For me, that's the trace of a bad film. Had they stuck to 911 alone, it would have atleast been a sincere effort, though not a great one. And SRK, once again, seems to be a victim of insipid, one-sided, monotonous, melodramatic characterization.
Watch MNIK Teaser
The more I want to mock at SRK's arch-rival Aamir's upcoming film - 3 Idiots, the more I tend to fall in love with the teasers of that film. Aamir looks absolutely promising and there is a lot to expect from the film in terms of emotional depth. And to add, I am immensely impressed at the unique marketting strategy applied by the producers (Aamir's disguise drama).
And what on the earth has SRK been thinking when he walked out of 3 Idiots and Maniratnam's Raavan, to dedicate himself to this uninspiring theme and Karan Johar? And to add to my fury, his upcoming line up is very insipid -- A Farah Khan venture, An Anubhav Sinha sci-fi and Don2. So for another three years, the SRK fanatic in me, has to live disappointed. Such painful pangs of maintaining fanaticism!!!!
P.S. found this interesting article in a forum on religious indifference across the world: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/intolerance-is-a-twoway-street/553467/0
Watch MNIK Teaser
The more I want to mock at SRK's arch-rival Aamir's upcoming film - 3 Idiots, the more I tend to fall in love with the teasers of that film. Aamir looks absolutely promising and there is a lot to expect from the film in terms of emotional depth. And to add, I am immensely impressed at the unique marketting strategy applied by the producers (Aamir's disguise drama).
And what on the earth has SRK been thinking when he walked out of 3 Idiots and Maniratnam's Raavan, to dedicate himself to this uninspiring theme and Karan Johar? And to add to my fury, his upcoming line up is very insipid -- A Farah Khan venture, An Anubhav Sinha sci-fi and Don2. So for another three years, the SRK fanatic in me, has to live disappointed. Such painful pangs of maintaining fanaticism!!!!
P.S. found this interesting article in a forum on religious indifference across the world: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/intolerance-is-a-twoway-street/553467/0
Sunday, December 13, 2009
I wanna grow up once again....
... these are the exact words why I will watch this film, probably, a zillion times. Aamir, Raju Hirani, Maddy, Shantanu, VVC have done a great job according to the film (3 Idiots) teasers; but it's this very song (give me some sunshine) that thrills me despite how good/bad the film may turn out.
The deepest desire of a grown-up is, most of the times, to grow up once again. And as fate has it, it's among those unfulfilled desires that intensifies as the grown-up grows older. I am not sure whether it's because of not wanting to grow older or wanting to be young forever. Or it could be because of the realization that they could not accomplish a few things that need to be, during the young years.
As we grow mature, we gradually lose the luxury of doing a few things as freely and shamelessly as we could do while being immature. Somewhere down the memory lane, those free and shameless moments tickle the funny bone and if someone lacks such moments to recollect, he/she would end up sounding serious and mechanical (or so-called 'practical').
Friday, December 11, 2009
Weekend Plan: Being Funny
The funny thing about being funny is that, most times, the fun is derived by the entertained at the cost of the entertainer's embarrassment. Not many people have the courage and attitude to conceal that instinct of embarrassment, when laughed at. And out of those few, fewer folks have the humbleness not to counter the prank and stick to what they aimed to be: being funny.
Contrary to the modern generation's taste for smart humor, I somehow seem to be more inclined towards the 'being funny' kind of humor. There are technically two reasons for it... one, that I lack the intelligence for smart humor; and second, I feel the challenge of counter-prank heavier than the embarrassment of being laughed at. So I feel so much likeliness to the 'little tramp' character played by the greatest, in my dictionary of great actors: Mr Charlie Chaplin.
Never in any of the roles played by him, did I find him make fun of the audience/society which laughs at him while watching him being funny. Though this applies to most comedy actors, being fanatic is normal. And my fanaticism over Charlie Chaplin emphasizes my normalcy.
Today, out of nowhere, a few scenes from the movie 'City Lights' flashed across my mind and felt a sudden urge to watch the movie. Though it would take a couple days for Netflix to send the DVD, I decided to watch his other films online. That's the plan for this weekend: to laugh at 'being laughed' (myself).
Contrary to the modern generation's taste for smart humor, I somehow seem to be more inclined towards the 'being funny' kind of humor. There are technically two reasons for it... one, that I lack the intelligence for smart humor; and second, I feel the challenge of counter-prank heavier than the embarrassment of being laughed at. So I feel so much likeliness to the 'little tramp' character played by the greatest, in my dictionary of great actors: Mr Charlie Chaplin.
Never in any of the roles played by him, did I find him make fun of the audience/society which laughs at him while watching him being funny. Though this applies to most comedy actors, being fanatic is normal. And my fanaticism over Charlie Chaplin emphasizes my normalcy.
Today, out of nowhere, a few scenes from the movie 'City Lights' flashed across my mind and felt a sudden urge to watch the movie. Though it would take a couple days for Netflix to send the DVD, I decided to watch his other films online. That's the plan for this weekend: to laugh at 'being laughed' (myself).
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Paa... Like Anjali
At the very outset, let me confess that the following is written not to criticize Balki's Paa, but just to compare how the structure of this story is comparable to Maniratnam's Anjali.
Like Anjali.... Paa is about an abnormal kid, Auro, who finally calls his parent affectionately before he dies. In Anjali, Anjali's last word before she dies is 'amma'. And in Paa, Auro's last word before he dies is... 'paa'.
Like Anjali.... Paa is the story of conflict between the parents of the kid, because of the kid.
Like Anjali.... Paa has children who are more mature and decent than normal kids.
Like Anjali.... Paa is a sensitive and sensible tear-jerker.
Like Anjali.... Paa has brilliant BGM by maestro Ilayaraja.
Like Anjali.... Paa has an awesome cinematography by PC Sriram.
Any more reasons required for Anjali fanatics to go, watch and love Paa? This is a highly recommended movie, folks!!!! Watch it.
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Fluidity of Want.....
This week there was a go-live at work. And when things didn't go well, I had to stay awake for a couple of nights. And guess what? I wanted to sleep all the while. I prayed for the issues to get solved so that I can go to sleep. Even after I got some sleep the next day, I felt of sleeping on time later.
I began to wonder, why I was not able to sleep the previous month, when I was so conscious about getting some good sleep. And that's where the key lies..... being conscious of sleeping. The more conscious I got, the more insomniac I became. And this week, when I had work as priority on my mind, I wasn't conscious that I need to sleep; and thus, I slept. Of-course, there is the tiredness factor attached to. But I think consciousness is the main culprit.
Want.... is as fluid as water. The more we try to hold it hard, the quicker it flows out of our palms. The consciousness that it will flow out will actually make us clench our fist to hold it hard; and thereby we lose our want. So, as long as we are careful enough (make a crest so that the water stays in your hand), and keep our palm open, the water remains with us till we quench our thirst with it. Now, stop arguing about the natural process of evaporation!!!!
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
The Turning Point.
"What happened to your confidence, dude?" A good friend was asking me, a while ago. "Why are you sulking and self-pitying all of a sudden?" Putting a blank face before her, I wondered for a long time: Did I ever carry the self-confident look before? If yes, then why am I not even able to remember how I felt like during those days?
"What do you mean, all of a sudden!!" I chuckled. "I was like this all along!" I declared with a fake confidence. She looked at me with a concerned look. "Don't begin to get comfortable with your failures, Purnesh. You will lose yourself very soon."
Oooops. Now that's over my head. "What do you mean?"
"Your blog entries for the last couple of days are not about your failures in life."
"Then?"
"They are just a proof that you have embraced failure. You don't like to challenge your failure and step up, because you feel you are comfortable by embracing it.... by pretending to like it.... and sulking in it. It's easy and relaxing to say that you can't do something; and you have totally lost your ability to say that: you can."
Just then her extension began to ring and she took call; and I felt it's time to escape more of her lecture. I casually ambled across the aisle to my place, trying to ignore her words. But, my 'I CAN ignore her words' attitude was dominated by my 'I CAN'T ignore her words' attitude. And, as I blankly stared at my no-new-mails inbox, my screwed-up mind got disturbingly furious; and I began to think...............
As humans, we always have tendencies to put ourselves in comfort zone. It's our mind's mechanism to make peace with the world around. But, the issue is not with being in the comfort zone, but choosing the wrong zone as a comfortable one. A stable job, trust-worthy friends, a caring life-partner, a good house, a great ambition, etc are all shades of good comfort zones. The bad ones are innumerable; and failure (self-pity) is the darkest of all. Choosing failure as a comfort zone is undoubtedly the worst choice ever made by all the innocent souls, who lack friends like mine, to make them realize their folly.
/* Dedicated to all my friends who bear all my crappy-ness and hope that someday I will see the brighter side of life. Thanks, folks!!! */
"What do you mean, all of a sudden!!" I chuckled. "I was like this all along!" I declared with a fake confidence. She looked at me with a concerned look. "Don't begin to get comfortable with your failures, Purnesh. You will lose yourself very soon."
Oooops. Now that's over my head. "What do you mean?"
"Your blog entries for the last couple of days are not about your failures in life."
"Then?"
"They are just a proof that you have embraced failure. You don't like to challenge your failure and step up, because you feel you are comfortable by embracing it.... by pretending to like it.... and sulking in it. It's easy and relaxing to say that you can't do something; and you have totally lost your ability to say that: you can."
Just then her extension began to ring and she took call; and I felt it's time to escape more of her lecture. I casually ambled across the aisle to my place, trying to ignore her words. But, my 'I CAN ignore her words' attitude was dominated by my 'I CAN'T ignore her words' attitude. And, as I blankly stared at my no-new-mails inbox, my screwed-up mind got disturbingly furious; and I began to think...............
As humans, we always have tendencies to put ourselves in comfort zone. It's our mind's mechanism to make peace with the world around. But, the issue is not with being in the comfort zone, but choosing the wrong zone as a comfortable one. A stable job, trust-worthy friends, a caring life-partner, a good house, a great ambition, etc are all shades of good comfort zones. The bad ones are innumerable; and failure (self-pity) is the darkest of all. Choosing failure as a comfort zone is undoubtedly the worst choice ever made by all the innocent souls, who lack friends like mine, to make them realize their folly.
/* Dedicated to all my friends who bear all my crappy-ness and hope that someday I will see the brighter side of life. Thanks, folks!!! */
Yours Faithfully: Based on true stories........
Once more....
Take One. The guy loves the girl. So he displays his honesty (yours faithfully) and tells her that he doesn't have a job yet; but he is sincerely trying for one. The girl rejects him and marries someone with a job; later, the 'devdas' gets a job.
Take Two. The guy loves the girl. So he hides the fact that he has committed murder, a few days back. He fakes that he works for an upcoming software firm. In due course, the girl falls in love with him. In a few more days, the love gets deeper and madder. They elope away and marry each other. A month later, the police catch the guy and put him behind the bars. The girl continues to love him (I know many women who consider their self-respect linked to being dedicated to the person whom they fell for; it's very much an ego problem).
Now, ignoring the simplicity with which the stories are narrated (mainly for dramatic effect), I wish to combine both the stories. And the resultant story is obvious. Why are we taught those simplistic moral science lessons from childhood? Had the first guy not been honest, and faked that he has a job, which he eventually would get, and then made the girl fall for him, it would have been a much healthier climax to the story.
Now, you folks may argue that, what if the girl gets angry on the guy for lying to her. My dear's, just check what happened in Take Two. Even if Take Two may not apply to all girls, my take is, a girl who cannot forgive her beloved for the simple lies that he told to get her, is not someone whom the guy should waste any more of his life (or lies) on.
So, my point is, the deserving-ness in the whole world is misplaced. Our fable tale moral science no longer works. Reminds me of Somerset Maugham's version of 'The Ant and the Grasshopper'.
Take One. The guy loves the girl. So he displays his honesty (yours faithfully) and tells her that he doesn't have a job yet; but he is sincerely trying for one. The girl rejects him and marries someone with a job; later, the 'devdas' gets a job.
Take Two. The guy loves the girl. So he hides the fact that he has committed murder, a few days back. He fakes that he works for an upcoming software firm. In due course, the girl falls in love with him. In a few more days, the love gets deeper and madder. They elope away and marry each other. A month later, the police catch the guy and put him behind the bars. The girl continues to love him (I know many women who consider their self-respect linked to being dedicated to the person whom they fell for; it's very much an ego problem).
Now, ignoring the simplicity with which the stories are narrated (mainly for dramatic effect), I wish to combine both the stories. And the resultant story is obvious. Why are we taught those simplistic moral science lessons from childhood? Had the first guy not been honest, and faked that he has a job, which he eventually would get, and then made the girl fall for him, it would have been a much healthier climax to the story.
Now, you folks may argue that, what if the girl gets angry on the guy for lying to her. My dear's, just check what happened in Take Two. Even if Take Two may not apply to all girls, my take is, a girl who cannot forgive her beloved for the simple lies that he told to get her, is not someone whom the guy should waste any more of his life (or lies) on.
So, my point is, the deserving-ness in the whole world is misplaced. Our fable tale moral science no longer works. Reminds me of Somerset Maugham's version of 'The Ant and the Grasshopper'.
Erich Segal's Love Story
Last night, when I picked up Erich Segal's Love Story from my bag-of-books, the memory of having turned the same pages five years ago flashed before me. It was quite an experience those days while reading this book. On the whole, I think I read this book more than five times: twice, fully from first page to last, and the rest was read like Tarantino's Pulp Fiction.
A simple story of a simpler girl and a rich guy, dwelling into their flirting, romance, love, the girl's terminal illness and the melodrama that lingers from there. The best part of any death story is the liveliness of the characters in it. Jennifer Cavelleri's quick-witted character haunted me, though not like a ghost, whenever I needed an imaginary girl-friend to make me laugh.
I was so very crazy about the book that I yearned to read more from Erich Segal and ended up buying his 'Oliver's Story' (sequel to Love Story) and 'Only Love'. And I stopped buying more. Years later, though I have read 'Doctors', Love Story remains as Erich Segal's masterpiece; and there can only be one masterpiece.
A simple story of a simpler girl and a rich guy, dwelling into their flirting, romance, love, the girl's terminal illness and the melodrama that lingers from there. The best part of any death story is the liveliness of the characters in it. Jennifer Cavelleri's quick-witted character haunted me, though not like a ghost, whenever I needed an imaginary girl-friend to make me laugh.
I was so very crazy about the book that I yearned to read more from Erich Segal and ended up buying his 'Oliver's Story' (sequel to Love Story) and 'Only Love'. And I stopped buying more. Years later, though I have read 'Doctors', Love Story remains as Erich Segal's masterpiece; and there can only be one masterpiece.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)